| MUARC home | About MUARC | Reports | Projects | VISU | Links | Contact MUARC |
| Monash Staff directory | A-Z index | Site map |
|
Locking the Stable Door: Preventing Equestrian InjuriesMonash University Accident Research Centre - Report #103 Authors: C. Finch & G. Watt Countermeasure Fact Sheets Full report in pdf format [780KB] Abstract:The medical and sports literature databases were searched for equestrian sports-related injury published in English since 1980, together with conference abstracts, and discussions with equestrian sporting bodies. This literature was critically reviewed, with emphasis on countermeasures. While there is considerable literature available on the epidemiology of injury incurred in most equestrian sports, there is little on the prevention of these injuries. Case-control or other studies evaluating the effectiveness of the countermeasures suggested by authors do not seem to exist. There is a good body of epidemiology that supports the proper use of approved helmets as a means of preventing injury in these sports. However, protective helmets do not always prevent injury as expected, and many riders do not choose to wear them because of perceived poor design. The search for the ideal equestrian helmet should continue. Ideally the effectiveness of helmets should be assessed scientifically. The use of rules and regulations for conduct of events, knowledge of horse behaviour, well-conducted lessons, contraindicated medical conditions, public education, rider education, appropriate equipment and clothing, the riding environment, rider experience, safety stirrups, body protectors, falling techniques, and first aid measures are among the other countermeasures discussed. Even though the injury rate for equestrians is relatively low by comparison with other sports, the injuries that are incurred are usually severe. In large part, prevention is difficult because the behaviour of the horse is unpredictable. Countermeasures used for prevention should be evaluated for effectiveness to reduce the frequency and severity of injuries to equestrians. Executive SummaryThe medical and sports literature databases were searched for equestrian sports-related injury published in English since 1980, together with conference abstracts, and discussions with equestrian sporting bodies. This literature was critically reviewed, with emphasis on countermeasures. While there is considerable literature available on the epidemiology of injury incurred in most equestrian sports, there is little on the prevention of these injuries. Case-control or other studies evaluating the effectiveness of the countermeasures suggested by authors do not seem to exist. There is a good body of epidemiology that supports the proper use of approved helmets as a means of preventing injury in these sports. However, protective helmets do not always prevent injury as expected, and many riders do not choose to wear them because of perceived poor design. The search for the ideal equestrian helmet should continue. Ideally the effectiveness of helmets should be assessed scientifically. The use of rules and regulations for conduct of events, knowledge of horse behaviour, well-conducted lessons, contraindicated medical conditions, public education, rider education, appropriate equipment and clothing, the riding environment, rider experience, safety stirrups, body protectors, falling techniques, and first aid measures are among the other countermeasures discussed. Even though the injury rate for equestrians is relatively low by comparison with other sports, the injuries that are incurred are usually severe. In large part, prevention is difficult because the behaviour of the horse is unpredictable. Countermeasures used for prevention should be evaluated for effectiveness to reduce the frequency and severity of injuries to equestrians. Ideally, the effectiveness of all equestrian injury countermeasures should be demonstrated before they are implemented or widely promoted. However, where there is good reason to believe that a particular countermeasure is highly effective, despite a lack of direct scientific evidence for its effectiveness, then the use of that countermeasure should continue, provided there are no known negative effects or disbenefits associated with the particular countermeasure. This would particularly apply to the use of protective helmets. Although there is evidence from the field and the laboratory that helmets may not be capable of preventing all head injuries, they have been shown to be effective in reducing injuries to bicyclists. With the emergence of new materials, the search continues to design the ideal helmet which will satisfy riders involved many equestrian sports. There is ample epidemiology that demonstrates equestrian injuries, although relatively infrequent, are generally severe, disabling and too often, fatal. Information needs to be collected on the extent of the implementation of, and attitudinal barriers against the use of existing equestrian countermeasures to inform the development of new and improved countermeasures. With a high injury frequency during lessons having been reported, it would seem that an assessment of the quality of rider education programs and facilities is needed. Standards and practices of riding schools should be subject to accreditation and inspection by an external body, where accreditation is not in place. Where countermeasures are aimed at primarily preventing injury, such as modification of the environment, and increasing skills and knowledge, they should be evaluated and then fully implemented. Where countermeasures are aimed at reducing injury severity, but for which there are doubts concerning their effectiveness, such as the use of safety stirrups or body protectors, formal evaluation should be conducted, preferably by case-control studies. Little work seems to have been done on evaluating the teaching and use of falling techniques. These could present a cheap and effective avenue of reducing a wide range of injuries, including those to the head, neck and upper extremities. Many equestrian sports bodies actively promote safety in their sport. Sometimes this promotion is formal, where internal or external official rules and regulations are applicable and enforced, at other times it consists of informal verbal advice and the supply of safety literature. There is scope for considerable variation in the advice and enforcement of safety issues, with a consequent possible variation in the frequency of injury to riders. No single equestrian organisation would have sufficient funds nor the expertise to properly assess the effectiveness of countermeasures. It may require coalitions of umbrella sports bodies, equestrian sports groups and researchers to conduct appropriate investigations. However, while there is so little knowledge of the effectiveness of countermeasures, equestrian injuries will continue to occur. It is not sufficient to claim the injury rate amongst equestrians is low, when the severity of the injuries which do occur is so high. The range of countermeasures considered in this review and the specific recommendations for further research, development and implementation are given below. RULES AND REGULATIONS
RIDER EXPERIENCE AND KNOWLEDGE
APPROPRIATE EQUIPMENT AND CLOTHING
ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS
PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT
FIRST AID
OTHER COUNTERMEASURES
Sponsor: Sport & Recreation, Victoria |