| MUARC home | About MUARC | Reports | Projects | VISU | Links | Contact MUARC |
| Monash Staff directory | A-Z index | Site map |
|
Benefit/cost Analysis of Road Trauma Countermeasures: rural road and traffic engineering programsMonash University Accident Research Centre - Report #34 - 1992 Author: K. Ogden Full report in .pdf format [1.8MB] Abstract:This report represents the results of a study which examined the safety effect of providing sealed shoulders, overtaking lanes, and edge lining on rural highways in Victoria. For shoulder sealing, a statistically significant reduction in casualty accident frequencies was found, equivalent to a 43 per cent reduction on a per vehicle kilometre basis. Comparing economic benefits and costs, a benefit/cost ratio was determined of 2.9 x (AADT in thousands), where AADT is Annual Average Daily Traffic. The study was unable to find any statistically significant effect of overtaking lanes or edge lining on accidents. SummaryThis report presents the results of a MUARC project which sought to determine the safety effect of three rural road programs, namely sealed shoulders, overtaking lanes, and edge lining. Data were obtained on the location, condition and cost of recently installed projects in each of these activities on two lane-two way roads (i.e. one lane in each direction) in Victoria. Accident data were obtained for these sites, and a before and after comparison, using control sites, was undertaken. Most shoulder sealing programs examined involved a low cost sealing of an existing shoulder, typically involving an interim bituminous sealing treatment, followed a year or so later with a reseal in conjunction with a pavement reseal. The shoulder width is typically between 600 and 1200 mm, with 600 or 800 mm being the most common. The results for this type of treatment indicate that:
benefit/cost ratio = 2.9 x (AADT in thousands)
The study was unable to find any statistically significant effect of overtaking lanes or edge lining on accidents. In the former case, this was mainly because of a small number of suitable sites and a short "after" period. In the latter case it was again because of a shortage of sites, and also the absence of a suitable control situation. More work in these areas is recommended. Sponsoring Organisation: Baseline Research Program - Australian Road Research Board, Department of Justice, Transport Accident Commission, Royal Automobile Club of Victoria (RACV) Ltd, VicRoads. |