Skip to content | Change text size

Injuries relating to beauty and appearance enhancing procedures (all ages)

Frequency : In 2006, there were 223 cases of injuries relating to beauty and appearance enhancing procedures to persons of all ages identified on the Victoria Emergency Minimum Dataset (VEMD).

Age: Injury cases peaked in older adolescents and young adults aged 15-24 years (35%). The frequency of these injuries steadily declined from age 25 years (Figure 1).

Figure 1

Source: VEMD, Jan – Dec ‘06

Figure 1: ED presentations of injuries relating to beauty and appearance enhancing procedures by age groups

Gender: Females were over - represented in ED presentations (80%).

Cause: The most common beauty procedures that resulted in injury were waxing, accounting for nearly half of the cases (40%), followed by piercing (17%), hair dying (11%), nail polish (7%) and tattoo (6%). Botox (0.5%), beauty products (0.5%) and tanning (1%) injuries were less common. However this may only reflect the popularity of some beauty treatments compared to others.

Nature of injury: The most frequently occurring injury diagnosis was burns, occurring in 44% of all cases. The equal second most common injuries were eye injury and foreign body-related injury, each accounting for 13% of all injuries (Figure 2).

Body region: Injuries relating to beauty products and processes were predominantly to the upper extremity (36%) and the head (15%). Lower extremity and multiple injuries accounted for only 3% and 2% of injuries, respectively. In 26% of cases, the body region injured was not specified (Figure 3).

Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 2: ED presentations of injuries related to beauty and appearance enhancing procedures by type of injury
Figure 3: ED presentations of injuries related to beauty and appearance enhancing procedures by body region injured

Location: More than half of the injuries relating to beauty and appearance enhancing procedures occurred in the home (58%) and 9% in a trade/service area.

Discharge status: Ninety-six percent of people with injuries relating to beauty and appearance enhancing procedures were discharged from the ED to home. About 2% of the injuries were severe enough to require hospitalisation.

Further information: Further information is available from the following websites:
Department of Health and Ageing and the National Industrial Chemical Notification and Assessment Scheme (NICNAS):
www.nicnas.gov.au/Current_Issues/Cosmetics.asp
The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC):
www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/323594

Data source: Victorian Emergency Minimum Dataset (VEMD): January to December 2006 (1 year)
Search Strategy: Beauty injuries were identified by searching those cases with the text term ‘tattoo', ‘haircut', ‘hair dying', ‘tanning', ‘piercing', ‘waxing', ‘botox', ‘beauty product', ‘makeup', ‘nail polish', ‘hair straightener', ‘massage' and spelling variations in the ‘description of injury event' variable.