Monash University Accident Research Centre - Report #264 [2007]
Authors: Hoareau, E., Newstead, S., Oxley, P. & Cameron, M.
Full report in .pdf format [613KB]
This report details the results of this analysis, performed using Poisson log-linear regression, and compares the outcomes of the two evaluations. The MUARC evaluation found that the implementation was associated with statistically significant average yearly reductions of 88%, 23% and 22% for fatal crashes, all casualty crashes and all reported crashes, respectively. Crash reductions appear to have increased with time after program implementation for each crash severity level considered. Analysis of speed survey data associated with the program implementation suggested these crash reductions stemmed largely from a reduction in excessive speeding in 50km/h zones rather than large reductions in mean speeds at the affected sites.
These results showed that QT internal evaluation underestimated the impact of the 50 km/h implementation. This resulted from a poorly specified treatment area that consisted of roads other than those that had changed to 50 km/h. This study also affirmed that the assumptions underlying the control chart method used by QT did not meet the theoretical properties of the crash data and formal statistical evaluation of program effects was better undertaken using Poisson regression techniques. However, the control chart method was endorsed as a satisfactory method for internal monitoring of program performance.
Sponsoring organisation - Queensland Transport